Utilizing the Discussion Group Function to Reconcile Conflicting Views of Multiple AI Roles
DeepGemini provides a discussion group feature to effectively manage conflicting AI viewpoints:
- 1. Selecting the right modeBuilt-in "Debate Mode" supports both sides to take turns to speak, and "SWOT Analysis Mode" can show multi-dimensional viewpoints.
- 2. Character Configuration: Setting differentiated personalities (e.g., "rigorous" and "creative") for different AIs in "Role Management" to avoid homogenized conflicts.
- 3. process control: Define the discussion flow using YAML by setting up speaking rounds and timeout mechanisms:
discussion:
rounds: 3
timeout: 30
Practice Recommendations:
- Gather all possible points of view in brainstorming mode first
- Setting up the role of facilitator to coordinate the discussion process
- Optimization of role interaction rules through log analysis (/logs directory)
- Combining advanced models such as the GPT-4 as referees to assess discussion quality
This answer comes from the articleDeepGemini: Multi-model orchestration of tasks and encapsulation into an API interfaceThe
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " How to resolve conflicting viewpoints in multi-AI role discussions?
English 
简体中文 
日本語 
Deutsch 
Português do Brasil