Academic users need to pay particular attention to the following guidelines for use:
- Core view attribution:The tool only optimizes the form of expression; the core findings and innovations of the paper must originate from the researcher himself or herself
- Principle of moderate use:Recommended for language touch-ups only, not to rely solely on AI to generate research content
- Agency policy compliance:Some institutions may prohibit any form of AI assistance, so be aware of your institution's rules before using it!
- Academic Integrity:The authenticity of the content should be guaranteed even if it passes the test, and the data and research methodology should not be falsified
- Manual calibration:The final text must be professionally reviewed by the author to ensure that academic rigor is not compromised
The judicious use of technological tools should serve to enhance the efficiency of scholarly communication, not replace the scientific thinking process.
This answer comes from the articleGPTHumanizer: a tool for converting AI text into human writing styleThe
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " What ethical issues do academic workers need to be aware of when using GPTHumanizer?
English 
简体中文 
日本語 
Deutsch 
Português do Brasil