common problems
Graduate students are prone to structural problems such as jumping from argument to argument, missing chains of evidence, and stiff chapter connections when writing literature reviews, which affects the grading of the paper.
response strategy
- Structured generation:Enter "Write a literature review on the application of blockchain in healthcare data security, with three chapters on technical principles, comparison of existing solutions, and future research directions" and AI will:
- Automatic insertion of transitions (e.g., "Having discussed...we now turn to..." type of academic articulation)
- Match each argument with 3-5 authoritative literature ideas
- Generation of logical relationship diagrams (achieved by exporting the HTML format)
- Correction Tool:
- Enter "Check whether the arguments in chapter 2 are supported by sufficient literature" and the AI will mark the weak points and recommend additional literature.
- Optimize presentation using professional instructions such as "strengthened causal argument"
- Tracing the evolution of argumentation logic through the version comparison function
quality assurance
By using the "Academic Rigor Check" function after generating the proposal, the AI will simulate the tutor's feedback to point out potential loopholes, reducing the number of structural revisions by 62% compared with the traditional writing method.
This answer comes from the articleDeskrib.ai: the AI tool that instantly generates professional documents from ideasThe
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " How to Prevent Logical Breakdowns in Academic Paper Writing with Deskrib.ai?
