Background analysis
Code quality issues are often difficult to assess quantitatively, and subjective evaluation methods lead to high team communication costs and technical debt that is difficult to detect. fuck-u-code establishes a standardized evaluation system through 7 objective dimensions.
Specific solutions
- Multi-dimensional scanning: Run
fuck-u-code analyze --verbosecommand to obtain seven metrics including cyclomatic complexity, function length, comment coverage, etc. - Visualization results: Identify problematic documents (high-priority issues highlighted in red) through color terminal reports
- Focused breakthroughs: Use
--top NThe parameter prioritizes the top N files with the most serious problems
Implementation of recommendations
It is recommended that a combination of--markdownParameters to generate report documents, incorporate list of quality issues as iterative tasks into project management tools, and refactor incrementally according to prioritization
This answer comes from the articlefuck-u-code: a testing tool for assessing code qualityThe
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " How to completely solve the problem of hard-to-assess code quality with the fuck-u-code tool?
