Comparison of revolutionary technological breakthroughs
Compared to the traditional modeling process, LHM brings three dimensions of technological innovation:
| comparison dimension | traditional approach | LHM Program |
|---|---|---|
| time cost | Professional division takes 2-3 days (includes topology optimization) | AI auto-generation in seconds |
| device dependency | 3D scanner/motion capture equipment required | Only single photo + regular graphics card required |
| Detail retention | Garment folds need to be hand-carved | Automatic reconstruction of high-frequency details such as embroidery/accessories |
The core strengths are:
- adoptionDifferentiable Gaussian SplattingTechnology for sub-millimeter geometric accuracy
- pass (a bill or inspection etc)Cross-modal attention mechanismsSolving the 2D to 3D ambiguity problem
- internally installedSMPL-X Parameterized Human A priori, ensuring anatomical soundness
Tests have shown that when importing LHM-generated models in Unity engine, the number of faces can be automatically optimized to 50,000-80,000 triangular faces, which meets the real-time rendering requirements.
This answer comes from the articleLHM: Generating action-enabled 3D human models from a single imageThe
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " What are the technical advantages of LHM over traditional 3D human modeling methods?
English 
简体中文 
日本語 
Deutsch 
Português do Brasil