The workflow recommended by Grug Design differs significantly from traditional design methods:
Collaboration Opportunities
Instead of the traditional waterfall process of "handing over the design when it's done", we emphasize continuous collaboration with the development team from the beginning of the project.
communication method
- Provide specific parameters: precise descriptions of values such as shadow size, opacity, etc., rather than vague aesthetic descriptions
- Understand the technical limitations: designers need to take the initiative to understand the feasibility of the realization, to avoid designing a solution that can not be put into practice
Tool Selection
Push to use:
- Simple basic tools: grid systems, basic shape tools, etc.
- Software with good core functionality: not overly functional design tools
Review mechanism
Streamline the design review process to avoid too many layers and meetings, and validate core ideas through rapid prototyping.
Iterative Rhythm
Promote an iterative pace of small steps, with each release focusing on solving a small but critical user need.
This answer comes from the articleGrug Design: gives design advice on pages and advocates a simple and pragmatic product design philosophy.The
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " How does Grug Design's workflow proposal differ from traditional methods?
English 
简体中文 
日本語 
Deutsch 
Português do Brasil