A multi-dimensional code quality assessment model
fuck-u-code has established a systematic code quality evaluation model, which contains seven core quality indicators:
- Cyclomatic Complexity: Assessing Logical Complexity through McCabe Metrics
- Function length detection: identifying long functions and code blocks
- Annotation coverage: assessing the level of document completeness
- Error handling specifications: testing the soundness of exception handling mechanisms
- Naming convention consistency: validating identifier naming quality
- Code duplication: identifying duplicate or redundant code
- Code structure quality: assessing the level of modular design
These seven dimensions are weighted and calculated to produce a 'Shit Mountain Index' (0-100 points), with higher scores indicating more serious technical debt, providing developers with objective quantitative assessment criteria.
This answer comes from the articlefuck-u-code: a testing tool for assessing code qualityThe
May not be reproduced without permission:AI productivity tools " Fuck-u-code builds a scientific code quality quantification system through seven assessment dimensions.
