CycleReviewer, one of the core components of the CycleResearcher system, does achieve a remarkable level of review accuracy of 74.24%. The component is capable of comprehensively evaluating academic papers, not only outputting professional review comments, but also giving average ratings and final acceptance/rejection decisions. This automated review function is particularly suitable for conference organizers and journal editors, and can significantly shorten the review cycle. It is worth noting that in order to improve the objectivity and comprehensiveness of the review, the system also provides a DeepReviewer component, which can simulate the cross-review of multiple reviewers and support the self-validation mechanism, which makes the overall quality of the review closer to the level of human experts.
This answer comes from the articleCycleResearcher: an AI-powered automation tool for academic research and reviewing manuscriptsThe
English 
简体中文 
日本語 
Deutsch 
Português do Brasil