Codex realizes true engineering closure through a five-stage workflow: requirements analysis → code iteration → test verification → version submission → document generation. Compared with the unidirectional output of traditional code-completion tools, it can independently handle 83% regular development problems. Data shows that in the continuous integration scenario, Codex executes an average of 2.7 test cycles per task, and the highest record is 11 consecutive iterations when fixing TensorFlow compatibility issues.
A typical workflow consists of: upon receiving the "Fix XSS Vulnerability in User Authentication Module" command, Codex performs the following sequence: 1) analyze the project security specification, 2) locate the vulnerable code, 3) apply the OWASP protection model, 4) run unit tests and security scans, and 5) generate the commit with the details of the CVE. Description. In one actual task, Codex not only fixed the target vulnerability, but also proactively improved the input validation logic of the neighboring modules.
<
>This model upgrades the role of the developer to that of an "architectural reviewer", focusing on requirements definition and quality control. Enterprise practices show that teams that adopt Codex save an average of 15-20 hours of repetitive coding time per week and triple the number of PRs passed in code reviews.
This answer comes from the articleChatGPT Codex: Intelligence for Automating Software Engineering TasksThe
English 
简体中文 
日本語 
Deutsch 
Português do Brasil